Friday, 7 February 2014

Revision Activity - Condensing


How few words can you get a topic down to?
a)      Start by re-writing your notes for a lesson or page from your revision guide. Keep it neat and make sure you include only the key points.
b)      From this, make 2 or 3 sentences – this can form a revision card for this lesson
c)       From this take just a few key words and add these to a revision card or mind map for the topic.

Tuesday, 4 February 2014

What is Secondary Data?

You have taken a certain amount of data for your coursework. However, to be fully certain of the conclusion you reach, you would want to look at some other sources. This extra information is known as secondary data. You take information from other people who have done the same experiment as you.
To get the minimum marks for this section, you will need to mention at least one extra set of data (you get given some by the exam board) and comment on the similarities and differences between this information and your own in your conclusion.

To get full marks for the secondary data, you will have to include data from several different sources (which you then reference). So take data from different groups as well as the exam board, and reference where the information is from. Describe and explain how much it supports or undermines your conclusion and explain how confident you are in this data, as well as why you are confident.

This is the section in which students struggle the most to get high marks

What's the Difference between a Conclusion and Evaluation?

There's often a lot of confusion about what goes into a conclusion and what is in an evaluation, and whether they are the same thing. Most of the confusion stems from the fact that they both talk about the experiment and the results (although given that we've spent so long working up to the experiment, it would be weird if they didn't). So what's the difference?

The evaluation involves looking at your experiment and seeing how you could have improved your technique. Evaluation looks at your results and asks if they show your experiment to have been performed well. It's like feedback on your performance - if you did the experiment again, what would you change? What new equipment might you use? Alternatively, explain why you think your method could not be improved.
If you had any outliers, mention them, or explain why you don't think you have any. Mention the range of data and error bars, and whether you feel they are acceptable (do the error bars overlap?). The evaluation looks at the accuracy and repeatability of the results. The exam board prefers the word 'repeatable' to 'reliable'. Repeatable means that if you did the experiment again, you could expect to get the same results and explain why.

The conclusion will relate back to the hypothesis. Did you prove your hypothesis correct? If you did, why are you so sure? The conclusion will also mention the results (the degree of scatter etc), but this time it's to do with how confident you are in the fact that they have proved your hypothesis. You need to bring in scientific knowledge again, this time to explain why you think the hypothesis is supported by your results. You could also talk about what extra data or further experiments would make you even more confident in your results. The conclusion will also bring in secondary data to prove your point. What is secondary data, I hear you ask? That's for another post...

Monday, 3 February 2014

Evaluation: How Could I Be More Accurate in my Coursework?

There are a lot of things we could have done to improve the accuracy of our coursework. For example, we could have used different beakers for each concentration to avoid cross-contamination. We could have pre-mixed the different dilutions in the lab, to ensure we did it correctly, rather than diluting as we went.The temperature is another factor that may have changed during the experiment - how could we have prevented this happening?


There are a few pieces of equipment we could have used instead:
Volumetric flask (Pictures available here) - this piece of equipment is used to dilute solutions, and the long neck allows us to be very accurate about the amount of liquid that we add. It would have allowed us to dilute the acid with much greater accuracy

Colorimeter (Pictures available here) - a colorimeter is a fancy machine that shoots lasers at a solution and calculates how much of the laser is able to pass through the liquid. From this you can work out how much of the light is blocked, or how cloudy the liquid is. We could have performed a much more rigorous experiment in which we took a colorimeter reading of the different reactions every 10 or 30 seconds.
As this equipment is expensive, we could instead have used a simple colorimeter, which consists of a light dependent resistor attached to a multimeter and power pack. We could have placed the resistor under the beaker and noted the current through the resistor at different times in the experiment, or stopped our stopwatch whenever the current reached a certain value.

Electric Stirrer (there are a lot of different variations of this - type magnetic stirrer or laboratory shaker into Google Images) - if you stirred your solution, there is a chance that you stirred different ones with a different amount of force. To prevent this happening, you could have used one of these specialised pieces of equipment. It would be a little bit of overkill in our experiment, but there's no harm in mentioning it, just to show that you're aware of how to improve.

Osmosis and Diffusion

Diffusion is the movement of molecules from an area of high concentration to an area of low concentration, until evenly spread out.
All living cells rely on diffusion to live.
They use it for:
  • Obtaining the raw materials for respiration (dissolved substances and gases)
  • Removing waste products (eg from respiration)
  • Photosynthesis in plants  (raw materials in, waste products out)
 
 
and
 
Osmosis is a special type of Diffusion
 
It is the net movement of water across a selectively permeable membrane from a high concentration to a low concentration
The selectively permeable membrane has very small holes in it. Small molecules can pass through, but larger ones cant.